Tuesday, 14 February 2017

Ouch: Only one in ten people still use a new app after a week

We all have short attention spans, we can admit that much. But did you know that only 4-5 percent of folks continue actively using an app after the first 30 days? That’s some serious goldfish action right there. What’s perhaps worse though is that only around one in ten people are still regularly using a new app one week after they installed it. Are apps really that bad at engaging us? Or do we simply move on so quickly now that even a week is too much time to commit to a new app?

Would you believe that these dismal retention rates actually represent an improvement when compared to last year though? Well, kinda. App Flyer‘s latest app engagement report indicates that Android retention rates actually dropped for organic installs – those apps you find, like and install naturally – whereas non-organic apps you’re incentivized to install actually had increased retention rates.

So we’re spending less time in apps we find on our own and more time in the promoted apps the advertisers and publishers want us to install? Hmm, how nice for them. While that may make you feel a little foolishly pliable, take solace in the fact that iOS users are even more obedient. Where non-organic retention rates increased by just 4 percent on Android, that increase was 25 percent on iOS devices (insert sheeple jokes here).

See also:

10 best new Android apps of 2017!

2 weeks ago

Android users are more likely to invest in the apps they find organically, while iOS users are much more likely to spend money on incentivized apps. Even though less than two percent of app installs lead to any kind of monetary transaction, you can see why developers continue to target iOS:

The chances of an engaged user turning into a buyer are almost 80% higher on iOS, while the odds of a user who installed an app becoming a buyer are 55% higher.

On the Android platform, North America has the best retention rates globally and is also the market most likely to convert a user into a paid user. With these stats in mind, sound off in the comments with your app usage habits: how long do you engage with a new app before moving on? How often do you pay for an app after installing it? Are you installing more promoted apps these days?

The post Ouch: Only one in ten people still use a new app after a week appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Ouch: Only one in ten people still use a new app after a week

http://ift.tt/2lh8BR5

We all have short attention spans, we can admit that much. But did you know that only 4-5 percent of folks continue actively using an app after the first 30 days? That’s some serious goldfish action right there. What’s perhaps worse though is that only around one in ten people are still regularly using a new app one week after they installed it. Are apps really that bad at engaging us? Or do we simply move on so quickly now that even a week is too much time to commit to a new app?

Would you believe that these dismal retention rates actually represent an improvement when compared to last year though? Well, kinda. App Flyer‘s latest app engagement report indicates that Android retention rates actually dropped for organic installs – those apps you find, like and install naturally – whereas non-organic apps you’re incentivized to install actually had increased retention rates.

So we’re spending less time in apps we find on our own and more time in the promoted apps the advertisers and publishers want us to install? Hmm, how nice for them. While that may make you feel a little foolishly pliable, take solace in the fact that iOS users are even more obedient. Where non-organic retention rates increased by just 4 percent on Android, that increase was 25 percent on iOS devices (insert sheeple jokes here).

See also:

10 best new Android apps of 2017!

2 weeks ago

Android users are more likely to invest in the apps they find organically, while iOS users are much more likely to spend money on incentivized apps. Even though less than two percent of app installs lead to any kind of monetary transaction, you can see why developers continue to target iOS:

The chances of an engaged user turning into a buyer are almost 80% higher on iOS, while the odds of a user who installed an app becoming a buyer are 55% higher.

On the Android platform, North America has the best retention rates globally and is also the market most likely to convert a user into a paid user. With these stats in mind, sound off in the comments with your app usage habits: how long do you engage with a new app before moving on? How often do you pay for an app after installing it? Are you installing more promoted apps these days?

The post Ouch: Only one in ten people still use a new app after a week appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Apple orders another 60 million OLED panels from Samsung

Despite being rivals, Samsung and Apple do a lot of business together. Last year, Apple placed an order with Samsung for 100 million OLED panels for its upcoming iPhone 8. But it appears that wasn’t enough. Apple sells a lot of smartphones per year and has, therefore, decided to place another huge order. According to a report from The Investor, Apple ordered an additional 60 million OLED panels from Samsung. The total value of the new deal is estimated to be around $4.3 billion.

Samsung is the biggest manufacturer of OLED panels in the world, which are found on around 70 percent of the company’s smartphones. With the tech giant hoping to increase sales of its upcoming Galaxy S8 series compared to its predecessor and committing to ship a total of 160 million OLED displays to Apple, we might see a supply shortage of OLED panels in the market this year.

See also:

How can Apple still sell iPhones at record average selling prices?

3 days ago

The demand for OLED screens is rising and companies are now more than ever willing to use them on their smartphones. This is because their price has decreased over the last few year and are now cheaper to produce than LCD panels. In order to avoid a supply shortage, production will have to be increased.

Samsung obviously isn’t the only OLED producer in the world. LG is also manufacturing OLED panels and is reportedly already ramping up production because of the increased demand. In addition, smaller companies in China and Japan have invested in developing in their own OLED manufacturing lines.

The post Apple orders another 60 million OLED panels from Samsung appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Apple orders another 60 million OLED panels from Samsung

http://ift.tt/2lLT6gX

Despite being rivals, Samsung and Apple do a lot of business together. Last year, Apple placed an order with Samsung for 100 million OLED panels for its upcoming iPhone 8. But it appears that wasn’t enough. Apple sells a lot of smartphones per year and has, therefore, decided to place another huge order. According to a report from The Investor, Apple ordered an additional 60 million OLED panels from Samsung. The total value of the new deal is estimated to be around $4.3 billion.

Samsung is the biggest manufacturer of OLED panels in the world, which are found on around 70 percent of the company’s smartphones. With the tech giant hoping to increase sales of its upcoming Galaxy S8 series compared to its predecessor and committing to ship a total of 160 million OLED displays to Apple, we might see a supply shortage of OLED panels in the market this year.

See also:

How can Apple still sell iPhones at record average selling prices?

3 days ago

The demand for OLED screens is rising and companies are now more than ever willing to use them on their smartphones. This is because their price has decreased over the last few year and are now cheaper to produce than LCD panels. In order to avoid a supply shortage, production will have to be increased.

Samsung obviously isn’t the only OLED producer in the world. LG is also manufacturing OLED panels and is reportedly already ramping up production because of the increased demand. In addition, smaller companies in China and Japan have invested in developing in their own OLED manufacturing lines.

The post Apple orders another 60 million OLED panels from Samsung appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Google Allo vs. iMessage: Which one does it best?

Google Allo vs. iMessage

Messaging apps are like fine wine – they get better with age. Or, at least in the case of the two we’re looking at here – Google Allo and iMessage – that seems to be the case. Similes aside, with the launch of Google Allo late last year, and with the most recent updates to iMessage in iOS 10, it’s hard not to draw clear commonalities and stark differences between the two and wonder which one is actually the superior app.

Yes, I know, this is Android Authority, and you don’t come here to read about Apple, but if Google has any hope of gaining market share in the world of interactive, rich messaging, they might have a thing or two to learn from Apple’s long-standing app. So, let’s take a quick look: Google Allo vs. iMessage.

User Interface

Let’s start by taking a look at the overall design, ease-of-use and fluidity of the apps. No matter what capabilities your app offers, I’m not inclined to use it unless it’s easy on the eyes, easy to figure out, and simply a joy to use. Fortunately, Google Allo and Apple’s iMessage both check off those boxes, but let’s take a look at some more of the specifics.

Allo

If you’ve used any of Google’s other apps like Hangouts or Inbox, you won’t find any surprises in Allo. You’ve got the standard hamburger menu where you’ll find your application and profile settings, and a floating action button to start a new conversation. Inside of conversations, you’ll find a very Nougat-esque design language, with the pill-shaped text bar that is a bit less harsh than the hard corners you’ll find in something like Google’s SMS app, Messenger. For a little added flair, you can change up the theme of your conversations for more fun background designs and message bubble colors. It’s a small feature, but goes a long way towards making the app more fun to use.

iMessage

Given that iMessage has been around for so long at this point, there’s a good chance you’ll know what to expect when opening the app. Speaking of fluidity, there is no arguing that Apple goes above and beyond to create a uniform experience inside of their “stock” apps, and iMessage is no different. The brilliance of the iMessage application comes from its level of polish everywhere you look. Every animation, every menu, every button – you can tell that no detail was left unexplored to ensure that you get the best experience possible. The iMessage application embodies what users have come to expect of Apple, a reliable, well-thought, buttoned-up experience.

Capabilities/Features

Google Allo vs. iMessage

Now let’s get to the fun stuff. At their core, both Google Allo and iMessage are simply messaging apps, but it’s their features, and lack thereof in some cases, that set them apart. Obviously, iMessage is an Apple exclusive, and Allo was designed with Android in mind, but let’s look beyond that.

Allo

When Allo was announced early in 2016, its primary draw was, of course, Google Assistant. Assistant, the evolved state of Google Now, is intertwined within the app, able to be accessed from within conversations to pull relevant information such as weather, locations, movie showtimes, etc. At first, it kind of seems gimmicky to be texting with a virtual assistant, but after a while of using the app, it’s actually pretty convenient to have Google ready when you need it during any conversation.

Google Assistant also exists as its own ‘contact’ in Allo, with which you can have standalone conversations. Here, you can basically query information like you would from the Google app, but your results will be returned in a more conversational manner. Assistant shines in this context by alerting you of reminders, sending you information like weather forecasts on a daily basis, and more. The conversational manner of Assistant also allows you to ask subsequent questions in context to get more information.

For example, you can ask Google “What’s tomorrow’s forecast?” and you will receive a nice visual representation of what you asked for. Then, you can immediately follow up with “What about this weekend?” Google will recognize that your second question is related to the first, and will return the additional information. Furthermore, Allo’s suggested responses that appear automatically above the keyboard make getting more information from Assistant incredibly easy to do with little input.

iMessage

Let’s start with the basics – iMessage supports SMS. Sounds like a no-brainer, but given that Allo does not, it’s definitely worth noting. So yes, you can text anyone from iMessage, you just won’t be able to use some of its key features.

Apple’s iMessage is a solid messaging app, no question about it. However, it doesn’t really have one ‘main draw’ like that of Google Allo. But, the fact is, it doesn’t need one. Unlike Android devices, iPhone’s comes with an excellent messaging application out of the box. One that’s packed full of features, and usually is enough to keep users from seeking an alternative. Many of iMessage’s flagship features focus on making conversations with your peers more intimate (in the innocent sense of the word) and personal. For instance, if you want to send a message to your wife saying, “I love you!”, you can add an animated heart balloon that will begin its animation when she views the message.

Other examples of this include confetti that takes over the screen, party balloons that float up from the bottom of the screen, fireworks exploding in the background, a shooting star, and more. These message enhancements are taken a step further with actions such as Slam; powerful and large text bubbles, Whisper; smaller and gentle text bubbles, Invisible Ink; keeps text and photos hidden until tapped, and more.

One of the coolest features of iMessage is the ability to replace words in your message with emojis. So if you type “Want to grab pizza tonight?”, the word ‘pizza’ will be highlighted as yellow text, and upon touching the word, will be replaced with a pizza emoji. On top of that, the App Store specific to iMessage has a ton of applications that enhance the experience of the app by giving you access to more stickers, the ability to make payments and more.

It’s hard to name a clear winner in this category since the applications share the same basic messaging functionality, as well as some others, such as the ability to send photos and videos, audio clips, stickers (with additional packs available for download) and real-time location sharing. However, when it comes to sheer volume of the things you can do with the app, iMessage edges out Google Allo. It’s very clear how much time and attention Apple has put into its messaging application, and if taken full advantage of, iMessage is a really enjoyable communication application to use.

Backup and Privacy

Privacy isn’t something we think about all the time when it comes to texting back and forth with friends, but the truth is, any information that falls in the wrong hands can spell bad news. So, what do iMessage and Allo offer in the way of privacy? And, what are your backup options if you ever to need to restore your messages at a later time?

Allo

Do you remember all that fuss about Google Allo indefinitely storing your messages to improve the app? Even Edward Snowden joined the conversation. Well yeah, that’s a thing. Messages you send with Google are protected from online predators by being scrambled from the time you send them to the time they reach Google’s servers, and again from the servers to the recipient, but Google does keep normal messages sent from Allo for their special use. Doing so allows Google’s messaging app to create those handy quick reply suggestions, as well as power Google Assistant.

However, if you are concerned with your privacy, you can use Allo’s Incognito Chat to ensure your messages are encrypted end-to-end, so only you and the recipient can read the message. Incognito Chat also has a pretty cool self-destruct feature (called “expiration” in the app) that gives you the ability to have your messages disappear from your device, as well as the recipient’s, in a set amount of time. The amount of time can range anywhere from 5 seconds to 1 week.

Backing up messages in Allo is something that definitely needs some work to say the least. Many users (including myself) have complained that when switching to a new device, you lose all of of your previous messages, even after linking the same Google account and phone number.

Given that Google is storing your conversations for other reasons, you’d think they would at least let you sync your message between different devices, but unfortunately that’s not an option.

iMessage

iMessage doesn’t have any real privacy settings, but that’s because Apple swears by its built-in privacy. Conversations in iMessage are encrypted end-to-end, and Apple says they will never store or scan messages for their own use – preventing them, or anyone else, from ever invading your privacy.

As you’ve likely heard about during recent events, Apple doesn’t create any “backdoors” with their products because that “undermines the protections” they’ve put in. The only two real privacy options you have with iMessage is the ability to choose how long your messages are stored; forever, a year or 30 days, and, how you would like your message previews to be displayed on the device.

When it comes to backing up your messages, there’s not much to worry about. There is a ton to complain about when talking about iCloud, but you can count on your iMessage conversations being backed up and accessible in multiple ways. If you get a new iPhone, iPad or Mac, you’ll immediately find your previous conversations right where you left them. As part of their privacy promise, however, you can opt to not have your messages stored at all if having them later is something you aren’t concerned with.

Major Complaints

Google Allo vs. iMessage

No app is without its flaws.

Allo

Oh, where to start. Don’t get me wrong, I like Allo. I really like it, but it has a long way to go before it will be what most people want it to be. To start, there is no SMS support. This is likely the biggest complaint among all users, because without true SMS support, Allo can’t replace your other messaging applications. Sure, you can send SMS messages to people who aren’t Allo users, but there’s a catch.

Instead of your message coming from you, the person you’re texting will get a message from a random 5-digit number. They’ll only know it’s you by seeing your name, followed by a colon, at the beginning of each message. On top of that, any Assistant-enabled functions you use in that conversation will come through as a vomit of links and special characters. I can promise this will come across as annoying to the recipient.

Allo also has no desktop client. So for those of us who sit in front of a computer for the majority of the day, this is a huge disappointment. Sure, you could use Hangouts, but what’s the point in using two different messaging apps when you could just use one? With iMessage, your messages are synced across your other devices, including macOS. So that might satisfy your need for a desktop client.

In my opinion, Allo is sort of facing an identity crisis, and Google is struggling to figure out where it fits in. Their long-running chat application, Hangouts, has a huge user-base given that it is built in to GMail, and the Android application has 1 BILLION+ installs (granted it comes pre-installed on many devices.)

Hangouts can be used as a default SMS application, but you also have Google Messenger which is a dedicated SMS app with 50,000,000+ installs. So, Google already has a dedicated chat app, and a dedicated SMS app, so that begs the question – why introduce something brand new instead of improving on what you already have? For me, I was expecting a full-fledged text messaging app that could replace what I currently use. But, what I got was a glorified chat app with some really cool baked-in goodies (i.e. Google Assistant).

iMessage

I’m honestly having a hard time finding things to complain about for iMessage. For the most part, it’s a pretty polished app. But, like I said, no app is perfect. As an Android user and long-time fan, one of the reasons I don’t use an iPhone is because of the lack of customization. iMessage mimics that experience for me. There is no option to customize your conversations between different contacts with various colors, and you can’t change the background of your conversations, other than using screen effects mentioned earlier.

My other complaint with iMessage is the slight learning curve when trying to grow accustomed to the many features available. For instance, to access the text enhancement features – Slam, Whisper, Invisible Ink, etc – you have to force touch the send button. But to access the stickers, GIFs, and other apps, you look in the iMessage App Store menu. To send heartbeats, kiss effects, etc. – that’s another menu. And finally, if you want to send a handwritten message, you have to flip the phone horizontally to reveal the sketchpad.

Bottom line – there are just too many features in too many places. Until you’ve had considerable amount of time to play around, you might find yourself hunting for a certain feature.

Lastly, I mentioned how iMessage syncs across all of your Apple devices, but what if you don’t have a Mac? In this case, you’ll have no means of using iMessage from your computer. This is especially frustrating considering that almost all other iCloud applications are available to access and use at iCloud.com, including Notes, Reminders, Photos, Calendar, and more. So why, Apple? Why haven’t you made iMessage accessible with an online interface?

Conclusion

Google Allo vs. iMessage

 

So, how do we wrap this all up? Well, I’m not going to call a clear winner here because I like both apps for different reasons. Sure, if we’re talking sheer volume of features, and level of polish, iMessage takes the cake, but the truth is, I have just as much fun using Allo as I do iMessage. And for me, that’s really what it’s about.

For Google Allo, I think the problem lies in how it was launched, how it was positioned at launch, and what users thought they were going to get, but didn’t.

For Allo to pick up any steam, and gain more market share among the other messaging apps, Google needs to make this clear to consumers. Google Assistant is an excellent selling feature, but without being able to text other people not using the app, why would users adopt this vs. Google Messenger? And, with no desktop interface, why would anyone adopt Allo instead of Hangouts?

As for iMessage, it clearly has its place in Apple’s ecosystem. You have it on your phone, you have it on your iPad, you have it on your Mac. Your messages sync across devices, are backed up for when you get a new device, and there are ton of cool features to make sure you’re always having fun. But, iMessage is missing that one BIG THING to really sell it. Maybe if Apple could improve Siri (on a couple of different levels) and integrate it into iMessage, similar to that of Google Assistant in Allo, there would be more of draw to the application. Fortunately for Apple, they have a leg up with the app being installed on every device. No need for them to worry about consumers having to beg their friends to jump on the bandwagon. They’re already there.

What are your thoughts on this subject? Will Google Allo ever be the iMessage of the Android world? Are the features in Google Allo enough to keep you interested and to make you try to convince your friends to join you? Let us know in the comments below!

The post Google Allo vs. iMessage: Which one does it best? appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Google Allo vs. iMessage: Which one does it best?

http://ift.tt/2lGlCVl

Google Allo vs. iMessage

Messaging apps are like fine wine – they get better with age. Or, at least in the case of the two we’re looking at here – Google Allo and iMessage – that seems to be the case. Similes aside, with the launch of Google Allo late last year, and with the most recent updates to iMessage in iOS 10, it’s hard not to draw clear commonalities and stark differences between the two and wonder which one is actually the superior app.

Yes, I know, this is Android Authority, and you don’t come here to read about Apple, but if Google has any hope of gaining market share in the world of interactive, rich messaging, they might have a thing or two to learn from Apple’s long-standing app. So, let’s take a quick look: Google Allo vs. iMessage.

User Interface

Let’s start by taking a look at the overall design, ease-of-use and fluidity of the apps. No matter what capabilities your app offers, I’m not inclined to use it unless it’s easy on the eyes, easy to figure out, and simply a joy to use. Fortunately, Google Allo and Apple’s iMessage both check off those boxes, but let’s take a look at some more of the specifics.

Allo

If you’ve used any of Google’s other apps like Hangouts or Inbox, you won’t find any surprises in Allo. You’ve got the standard hamburger menu where you’ll find your application and profile settings, and a floating action button to start a new conversation. Inside of conversations, you’ll find a very Nougat-esque design language, with the pill-shaped text bar that is a bit less harsh than the hard corners you’ll find in something like Google’s SMS app, Messenger. For a little added flair, you can change up the theme of your conversations for more fun background designs and message bubble colors. It’s a small feature, but goes a long way towards making the app more fun to use.

iMessage

Given that iMessage has been around for so long at this point, there’s a good chance you’ll know what to expect when opening the app. Speaking of fluidity, there is no arguing that Apple goes above and beyond to create a uniform experience inside of their “stock” apps, and iMessage is no different. The brilliance of the iMessage application comes from its level of polish everywhere you look. Every animation, every menu, every button – you can tell that no detail was left unexplored to ensure that you get the best experience possible. The iMessage application embodies what users have come to expect of Apple, a reliable, well-thought, buttoned-up experience.

Capabilities/Features

Google Allo vs. iMessage

Now let’s get to the fun stuff. At their core, both Google Allo and iMessage are simply messaging apps, but it’s their features, and lack thereof in some cases, that set them apart. Obviously, iMessage is an Apple exclusive, and Allo was designed with Android in mind, but let’s look beyond that.

Allo

When Allo was announced early in 2016, its primary draw was, of course, Google Assistant. Assistant, the evolved state of Google Now, is intertwined within the app, able to be accessed from within conversations to pull relevant information such as weather, locations, movie showtimes, etc. At first, it kind of seems gimmicky to be texting with a virtual assistant, but after a while of using the app, it’s actually pretty convenient to have Google ready when you need it during any conversation.

Google Assistant also exists as its own ‘contact’ in Allo, with which you can have standalone conversations. Here, you can basically query information like you would from the Google app, but your results will be returned in a more conversational manner. Assistant shines in this context by alerting you of reminders, sending you information like weather forecasts on a daily basis, and more. The conversational manner of Assistant also allows you to ask subsequent questions in context to get more information.

For example, you can ask Google “What’s tomorrow’s forecast?” and you will receive a nice visual representation of what you asked for. Then, you can immediately follow up with “What about this weekend?” Google will recognize that your second question is related to the first, and will return the additional information. Furthermore, Allo’s suggested responses that appear automatically above the keyboard make getting more information from Assistant incredibly easy to do with little input.

iMessage

Let’s start with the basics – iMessage supports SMS. Sounds like a no-brainer, but given that Allo does not, it’s definitely worth noting. So yes, you can text anyone from iMessage, you just won’t be able to use some of its key features.

Apple’s iMessage is a solid messaging app, no question about it. However, it doesn’t really have one ‘main draw’ like that of Google Allo. But, the fact is, it doesn’t need one. Unlike Android devices, iPhone’s comes with an excellent messaging application out of the box. One that’s packed full of features, and usually is enough to keep users from seeking an alternative. Many of iMessage’s flagship features focus on making conversations with your peers more intimate (in the innocent sense of the word) and personal. For instance, if you want to send a message to your wife saying, “I love you!”, you can add an animated heart balloon that will begin its animation when she views the message.

Other examples of this include confetti that takes over the screen, party balloons that float up from the bottom of the screen, fireworks exploding in the background, a shooting star, and more. These message enhancements are taken a step further with actions such as Slam; powerful and large text bubbles, Whisper; smaller and gentle text bubbles, Invisible Ink; keeps text and photos hidden until tapped, and more.

One of the coolest features of iMessage is the ability to replace words in your message with emojis. So if you type “Want to grab pizza tonight?”, the word ‘pizza’ will be highlighted as yellow text, and upon touching the word, will be replaced with a pizza emoji. On top of that, the App Store specific to iMessage has a ton of applications that enhance the experience of the app by giving you access to more stickers, the ability to make payments and more.

It’s hard to name a clear winner in this category since the applications share the same basic messaging functionality, as well as some others, such as the ability to send photos and videos, audio clips, stickers (with additional packs available for download) and real-time location sharing. However, when it comes to sheer volume of the things you can do with the app, iMessage edges out Google Allo. It’s very clear how much time and attention Apple has put into its messaging application, and if taken full advantage of, iMessage is a really enjoyable communication application to use.

Backup and Privacy

Privacy isn’t something we think about all the time when it comes to texting back and forth with friends, but the truth is, any information that falls in the wrong hands can spell bad news. So, what do iMessage and Allo offer in the way of privacy? And, what are your backup options if you ever to need to restore your messages at a later time?

Allo

Do you remember all that fuss about Google Allo indefinitely storing your messages to improve the app? Even Edward Snowden joined the conversation. Well yeah, that’s a thing. Messages you send with Google are protected from online predators by being scrambled from the time you send them to the time they reach Google’s servers, and again from the servers to the recipient, but Google does keep normal messages sent from Allo for their special use. Doing so allows Google’s messaging app to create those handy quick reply suggestions, as well as power Google Assistant.

However, if you are concerned with your privacy, you can use Allo’s Incognito Chat to ensure your messages are encrypted end-to-end, so only you and the recipient can read the message. Incognito Chat also has a pretty cool self-destruct feature (called “expiration” in the app) that gives you the ability to have your messages disappear from your device, as well as the recipient’s, in a set amount of time. The amount of time can range anywhere from 5 seconds to 1 week.

Backing up messages in Allo is something that definitely needs some work to say the least. Many users (including myself) have complained that when switching to a new device, you lose all of of your previous messages, even after linking the same Google account and phone number.

Given that Google is storing your conversations for other reasons, you’d think they would at least let you sync your message between different devices, but unfortunately that’s not an option.

iMessage

iMessage doesn’t have any real privacy settings, but that’s because Apple swears by its built-in privacy. Conversations in iMessage are encrypted end-to-end, and Apple says they will never store or scan messages for their own use – preventing them, or anyone else, from ever invading your privacy.

As you’ve likely heard about during recent events, Apple doesn’t create any “backdoors” with their products because that “undermines the protections” they’ve put in. The only two real privacy options you have with iMessage is the ability to choose how long your messages are stored; forever, a year or 30 days, and, how you would like your message previews to be displayed on the device.

When it comes to backing up your messages, there’s not much to worry about. There is a ton to complain about when talking about iCloud, but you can count on your iMessage conversations being backed up and accessible in multiple ways. If you get a new iPhone, iPad or Mac, you’ll immediately find your previous conversations right where you left them. As part of their privacy promise, however, you can opt to not have your messages stored at all if having them later is something you aren’t concerned with.

Major Complaints

Google Allo vs. iMessage

No app is without its flaws.

Allo

Oh, where to start. Don’t get me wrong, I like Allo. I really like it, but it has a long way to go before it will be what most people want it to be. To start, there is no SMS support. This is likely the biggest complaint among all users, because without true SMS support, Allo can’t replace your other messaging applications. Sure, you can send SMS messages to people who aren’t Allo users, but there’s a catch.

Instead of your message coming from you, the person you’re texting will get a message from a random 5-digit number. They’ll only know it’s you by seeing your name, followed by a colon, at the beginning of each message. On top of that, any Assistant-enabled functions you use in that conversation will come through as a vomit of links and special characters. I can promise this will come across as annoying to the recipient.

Allo also has no desktop client. So for those of us who sit in front of a computer for the majority of the day, this is a huge disappointment. Sure, you could use Hangouts, but what’s the point in using two different messaging apps when you could just use one? With iMessage, your messages are synced across your other devices, including macOS. So that might satisfy your need for a desktop client.

In my opinion, Allo is sort of facing an identity crisis, and Google is struggling to figure out where it fits in. Their long-running chat application, Hangouts, has a huge user-base given that it is built in to GMail, and the Android application has 1 BILLION+ installs (granted it comes pre-installed on many devices.)

Hangouts can be used as a default SMS application, but you also have Google Messenger which is a dedicated SMS app with 50,000,000+ installs. So, Google already has a dedicated chat app, and a dedicated SMS app, so that begs the question – why introduce something brand new instead of improving on what you already have? For me, I was expecting a full-fledged text messaging app that could replace what I currently use. But, what I got was a glorified chat app with some really cool baked-in goodies (i.e. Google Assistant).

iMessage

I’m honestly having a hard time finding things to complain about for iMessage. For the most part, it’s a pretty polished app. But, like I said, no app is perfect. As an Android user and long-time fan, one of the reasons I don’t use an iPhone is because of the lack of customization. iMessage mimics that experience for me. There is no option to customize your conversations between different contacts with various colors, and you can’t change the background of your conversations, other than using screen effects mentioned earlier.

My other complaint with iMessage is the slight learning curve when trying to grow accustomed to the many features available. For instance, to access the text enhancement features – Slam, Whisper, Invisible Ink, etc – you have to force touch the send button. But to access the stickers, GIFs, and other apps, you look in the iMessage App Store menu. To send heartbeats, kiss effects, etc. – that’s another menu. And finally, if you want to send a handwritten message, you have to flip the phone horizontally to reveal the sketchpad.

Bottom line – there are just too many features in too many places. Until you’ve had considerable amount of time to play around, you might find yourself hunting for a certain feature.

Lastly, I mentioned how iMessage syncs across all of your Apple devices, but what if you don’t have a Mac? In this case, you’ll have no means of using iMessage from your computer. This is especially frustrating considering that almost all other iCloud applications are available to access and use at iCloud.com, including Notes, Reminders, Photos, Calendar, and more. So why, Apple? Why haven’t you made iMessage accessible with an online interface?

Conclusion

Google Allo vs. iMessage

 

So, how do we wrap this all up? Well, I’m not going to call a clear winner here because I like both apps for different reasons. Sure, if we’re talking sheer volume of features, and level of polish, iMessage takes the cake, but the truth is, I have just as much fun using Allo as I do iMessage. And for me, that’s really what it’s about.

For Google Allo, I think the problem lies in how it was launched, how it was positioned at launch, and what users thought they were going to get, but didn’t.

For Allo to pick up any steam, and gain more market share among the other messaging apps, Google needs to make this clear to consumers. Google Assistant is an excellent selling feature, but without being able to text other people not using the app, why would users adopt this vs. Google Messenger? And, with no desktop interface, why would anyone adopt Allo instead of Hangouts?

As for iMessage, it clearly has its place in Apple’s ecosystem. You have it on your phone, you have it on your iPad, you have it on your Mac. Your messages sync across devices, are backed up for when you get a new device, and there are ton of cool features to make sure you’re always having fun. But, iMessage is missing that one BIG THING to really sell it. Maybe if Apple could improve Siri (on a couple of different levels) and integrate it into iMessage, similar to that of Google Assistant in Allo, there would be more of draw to the application. Fortunately for Apple, they have a leg up with the app being installed on every device. No need for them to worry about consumers having to beg their friends to jump on the bandwagon. They’re already there.

What are your thoughts on this subject? Will Google Allo ever be the iMessage of the Android world? Are the features in Google Allo enough to keep you interested and to make you try to convince your friends to join you? Let us know in the comments below!

The post Google Allo vs. iMessage: Which one does it best? appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Monday, 13 February 2017

Google's Instant Apps rolling out to some and Wish is first out of the gate

Are we ready for apps that install from a search result? We need to be because they’re here.

Some folks are starting to see Google’s Instant Apps feature roll out to their phones and it seems like Wish is the first company to use them.

Back at Google I/O 2016 Google told us about Instant Apps. The idea is that you would find an app in your Google search results and be able to tap a button and start using it, much the same way you would use a web page. They are “real” apps with a component that installs on your phone and not a web-optimized or HTML5 app that lives completely in the cloud. This should be a great way for companies to expose people to what they have to offer from a native app without having to get us to leave the search and open the Play Store to download it. For us, it means we can get instant access to something like a shopping app instead of using a web page that might not be designed for a small touch-based screen. Everyone wins.

Up until now, everything about Instant Apps has been in a slow testing phase while everyone outside just watches. But we’ve heard several reports from folks saying they can install and use the Wish instant app on their phones with Android 7.0 installed. We’re seeing the same thing here, and our pals at Audroid are, too. This is what the process is like.

  • Open your settings and find Google Settings.
  • Find the Instant Apps setting and tap the switch to enable it.
  • Read the terms and agree.

Now when you’re searching for something (in this case the Wish website) you might see a search result for an Instant App version. If you open it, you’ll be able to install a tiny part of the app and jump right in.

Shopping sites and news websites will be able to benefit from these, and other companies are thinking about how they can leverage giving a user access without taking them away from their search. The idea is pretty cool, and we’re excited to see how companies use it to lure us to them.

Anyone else out there seeing Instant Apps? Give a shout in the comments!

The post Google's Instant Apps rolling out to some and Wish is first out of the gate appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

This is how you play Google Cardboard apps on your Samsung Gear VR

It’s real, and it’s awesome.

Samsung gear VR owners can now use Google Cardboard apps through their preferred headset, instead of having to switch back and forth between a Cardboard viewer and something else. It’s pretty easy to set up, and our friends over at VRHeads have everything you need to get started with every version of the Gear VR. Enjoy!

Take me to the article!

The post This is how you play Google Cardboard apps on your Samsung Gear VR appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Google's Instant Apps rolling out to some and Wish is first out of the gate

http://ift.tt/2l9VnG9

Are we ready for apps that install from a search result? We need to be because they’re here.

Some folks are starting to see Google’s Instant Apps feature roll out to their phones and it seems like Wish is the first company to use them.

Back at Google I/O 2016 Google told us about Instant Apps. The idea is that you would find an app in your Google search results and be able to tap a button and start using it, much the same way you would use a web page. They are “real” apps with a component that installs on your phone and not a web-optimized or HTML5 app that lives completely in the cloud. This should be a great way for companies to expose people to what they have to offer from a native app without having to get us to leave the search and open the Play Store to download it. For us, it means we can get instant access to something like a shopping app instead of using a web page that might not be designed for a small touch-based screen. Everyone wins.

Up until now, everything about Instant Apps has been in a slow testing phase while everyone outside just watches. But we’ve heard several reports from folks saying they can install and use the Wish instant app on their phones with Android 7.0 installed. We’re seeing the same thing here, and our pals at Audroid are, too. This is what the process is like.

  • Open your settings and find Google Settings.
  • Find the Instant Apps setting and tap the switch to enable it.
  • Read the terms and agree.

Now when you’re searching for something (in this case the Wish website) you might see a search result for an Instant App version. If you open it, you’ll be able to install a tiny part of the app and jump right in.

Shopping sites and news websites will be able to benefit from these, and other companies are thinking about how they can leverage giving a user access without taking them away from their search. The idea is pretty cool, and we’re excited to see how companies use it to lure us to them.

Anyone else out there seeing Instant Apps? Give a shout in the comments!

The post Google's Instant Apps rolling out to some and Wish is first out of the gate appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

This is how you play Google Cardboard apps on your Samsung Gear VR

http://ift.tt/2l9PLf9

It’s real, and it’s awesome.

Samsung gear VR owners can now use Google Cardboard apps through their preferred headset, instead of having to switch back and forth between a Cardboard viewer and something else. It’s pretty easy to set up, and our friends over at VRHeads have everything you need to get started with every version of the Gear VR. Enjoy!

Take me to the article!

The post This is how you play Google Cardboard apps on your Samsung Gear VR appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

N.O.V.A. Legacy will soon take Android gamers to the stars

In 2009, Gameloft released N.O.V.A. (Near Orbit Vanguard Alliance), a sci-fi first-person shooter for mobile devices. The game had more than a little resemblance to Microsoft’s Halo series for the Xbox, at least in terms of its art style. The game got solid reviews and was successful enough to spawn two sequels. However, the last game in the series, N.O.V.A. 3, was released way back in 2012, or about five years ago. Now Gameloft is posting up teasers for a new game called N.O.V.A. Legacy that will be coming soon to Android.

See also:

Best action games for Android!

1 week ago

Unfortunately, Gameloft is keeping many of the details of N.O.V.A. Legacy to itself, at least for now. It did release a teaser video today, but all it shows was a futuristic helmet floating in space, with no real gameplay footage.

The game’s official Facebook page does offer a little more info, saying that N.O.V.A. Legacy will offer the “best sci-fi FPS experience from the epic first episode of the critically acclaimed N.O.V.A. saga — all in a compact 20MB!”

You can pre-register on Facebook as well to get an alert for when N.O.V.A. Legacy goes live. That page also reveals a little more info on the game itself, including the fact that it will support online multiplayer with up to 6 players, along with a way to craft and upgrade your weapons. In fact, pre-registering will give players access to extra weapon upgrades, consumables and custom character skins that are worth $8, which also suggests that game will be of the free-to-play shooter genre.

Did you play the original N.O.V.A.? If so, will you check out this new and revamped edition in N.O.V.A. Legacy?

Pre-register now on Facebook

The post N.O.V.A. Legacy will soon take Android gamers to the stars appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 tablet render with S Pen leaks ahead of MWC 2017 reveal

Samsung has already strongly hinted in its 2017 Mobile World Congress press event invite that will reveal at least one new tablet on Feb. 26 in Barcelona, Spain. Now a new report claims to have an image of that tablet, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S3, while also showing its included S Pen.

See also:

Best Android tablets

4 weeks ago

Both the render and the report come from the German language site WinFuture.de, via unnamed sources. The pressure-sensitive S Pen will not have a way to store it in the Galaxy Tab S3, as the similar S Pen on the company’s Galaxy Note phones have done. Also, the story is reporting that there will just be a 9.7-inch version, as Samsung will not offer an 8-inch edition as it has with other tablets in the Tab S series.

The tablet will have a 2048×1536 SuperAMOLED display, along with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor inside, according to the report. It will also have 4GB of RAM and 32GB of onboard storage. It’s also supposed to have a 12MP rear camera and a 4.7MP front-facing camera. The tablet is supposed to come in Wi-Fi only models, along with ones with both Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity. Finally, the story claims that Samsung will sell the Galaxy Tab S3 in its normal black color, along with a silver version, which is meant to take the place of the previous white color option.

The story claims that the starting price for the Galaxy Tab S3 could be about $580, and we would assume that is for the Wi-Fi only version, and not with the one with the additional cellular wireless hardware. As always with these kinds of unconfirmed reports, take this one with a grain of salt until we get the official word from Samsung.

In the meantime we will be attending the company’s MWC 2017 press event and will get the first-hand info and impressions about whatever Samsung will reveal. There are rumors that the company could show a video preview of its next major smartphone flagship, the Galaxy S8, at the event on Feb. 26.

The post Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 tablet render with S Pen leaks ahead of MWC 2017 reveal appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

New chip from MIT could mean power-efficient AI in all your electronics

Researchers at MIT have developed a low-power chip specialized for automatic speech recognition that could result in a power savings of up to 99 percent.

See also:

Google Assistant may soon help you make online purchases

4 weeks ago

Although far from being perfect, Apple’s Siri transformed how we perceive mobile artificial intelligence. Since then we’ve seen similar attempts from various companies – from the disastrous S-Voice to the most recent Google Assistant. In fact, 2017 is shaping up to be the year of AI: Android Wear 2.0 has Google’s virtual assistant built in, Samsung is rumored to bring an improved AI assistant with the Galaxy S8, and IoT home devices are becoming more and more commonplace.

However, these advanced virtual assistants rely on speech recognition, and often, it has to be always on in order to detect your command. That means even the most power-efficient devices go from 100 percent to 0 pretty fast. Now, researchers at MIT have built a chip that’s specifically designed with that problem in mind. They explain that whereas a normal phone would use around 1 watt of power for speech-recognition, the new chip would only require a fraction of that: 0.2 to 10 milliwatts.

They explain that whereas a normal phone would use around 1 watt of power for speech-recognition, the new chip would only require a fraction of that: 0.2 to 10 milliwatts.

The way the new chip works is instead of running full-scale neural networks all the time to detect every sound and noise, it will have a simpler “voice activity detection” circuit that can spot human speech. Once it does detect human speech, the chip “fires up the larger, more complex speech-recognition circuit” according to MIT. The result is that we could see a power savings of anywhere from 90 percent all the way up to 99 percent, meaning even small and simple electronic devices could be powered by advanced speech-recognition systems and AI assistants.

As Anantha Chandrakasan, the Vannevar Bush Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, explains, the sheer efficiency of this new chip could mean wider use of speech input capabilities:

Speech input will become a natural interface for many wearable applications and intelligent devices. The miniaturization of these devices will require a different interface than touch or keyboard. It will be critical to embed the speech functionality locally to save system energy consumption compared to performing this operation in the cloud.

As wearables – smartwatches, earphones, glasses, etc. – grow, speech will become an essential mode of human-to-device communication. Given wearable devices’ usual size, MIT’s new power-efficient chip could be an answer to creating gadgets that last for long enough to be actually useful.

The post New chip from MIT could mean power-efficient AI in all your electronics appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Android Instant Apps is slowly rolling out to select smartphones and apps

A few weeks after Google announced it would begin a limited test of its previously announced Android Instant Apps platform, some of these apps are now available for a limited number of smartphone owners. The apps have been created so users can access and use them without having to download them directly to their device.

See also:

How to enable Developer Options on your Android device

December 5, 2016

The idea behind these apps, which were first announced at Google I/O 2016, is centered on keeping download files sizes down to the bare minimal. In this case, the Google Play Store downloads only enough code for the Android Instant App to run on the device. The apps are designed to be found in web-based Google search results without the need to go directly to the Play Store.

9to5Google reports that some owners of Google’s Nexus and Pixel phones running on Android Nougat are now able to go into their phone’s settings to activate the Instant Apps support. If you own one of these phones, you can try to see if it’s available. First, go into the device settings, then to their Personal option and scroll down until you see and tap on the Google selection. Then you go to the Services heading where Instant Apps should show up. Finally, tapping on that toggle should turn it on after you agree to abide by the terms of service.

Google previously said that the first apps that would be a part of this small Instant Apps test would include BuzzFeed, Wish, Periscope, and Viki. It looks like the majority of people online who have support for this test are having the most success with activating the Wish app. Keep in mind that Google is only letting a select few apps and smartphones use Instant Apps. We will likely see the company expand this test to more phones and apps in the coming weeks and months.

If you have been able to unlock the Instant Apps support on your phone, what are your initial impressions? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

The post Android Instant Apps is slowly rolling out to select smartphones and apps appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Slice and Rise is a frustratingly addictive game from Play Store

A brand new game from LEAP SAC, Slice and Rise is a simple arcade game but may very well become your next addiction.

See also:

15 best arcade games for Android

July 11, 2016

As you can see from the video above, the game itself is very simple: you drag and release the main character like you would on Angry Birds, and that’s how the samurai moves upward. You have to keep moving because at the bottom of the screen is a pit of hell fire, and after each move, the samurai slowly falls. But the real fun comes from all the added fun.

There are trails of coins you can collect as you navigate the little guy – which can later be used for things like shield, speed booster, alternate characters, etc. – but there are mini challenges along the way. Some are obstacles that are easy to avoid, but some will deliberately come in your way. Some you can simply go around, but some you need to fight and win. This may sound all too easy, but for the first few tries, I had difficulty just getting used to the whole slingshot navigation. Also, it’s hard to predict what’s going to be on top of the screen. Combine that with the fact that you are very, very close to the lava at the bottom makes this one extremely frustrating experience.

However, as frustrating as the game can be, it certainly had me hooked. I found myself dying constantly but doggedly trying to see how far I could go.

However, as frustrating as the game can be, it certainly had me hooked. I found myself dying constantly but doggedly trying to see how far I could go. Though one thing that’s worth mentioning is that while the game itself is completely free, there are ads that are around 30 seconds long – and when you’re a samurai and trying to harness magical powers by defeating evil enemies, 30 seconds feel like 30 centuries.

If you want to give this game a try, simply click the button below, and let us know what you think by leaving a comment!

Download from Play Store

The post Slice and Rise is a frustratingly addictive game from Play Store appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

LineageOS builds now available for OnePlus 3T, ZTE Axon 7 and more

LineageOS, the Android-based custom ROM project launched late in 2016 by many of the former team members of CyanogenMod, has been quite busy adding new phones that can support the ROM. After launching its first official builds for a number of phones in mid-January, it has now added several more devices that can run the Nougat-based LineageOS 14.1.

See also:

The current state of custom ROM development

4 weeks ago

The biggest new addition is for the OnePlus 3T, and in fact that build has now been merged with the previous version for the older OnePlus 3, so both should now be updated for LineageOS at the same time from now on. Another new addition is the ZTE Axon 7, which recently got its own official update to Nougat.

The other devices are a bit older, including the HTC One M7, in both unlocked and Verizon versions, along with the Sprint version of the LG G3. Finally, you can download a build of LineageOS 14.1 for the 2016 versions of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 tablets in 8.0-inch and 9.7-inch models.

You can check out all the newly added builds on the LineageOS download page. The group’s statistic page shows that overall, it has gotten close to 440,000 total build downloads, at least as of this writing. It also shows that the OnePlus One (which is identified by the name “bacon”) has continued to get the most downloads, with over 35,000 recorded. That’s nearly twice as much as the second phone on the stats list, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (given the name “kenzo”).

Hopefully, the team will continue to add more phones to the LineageOS support list, and will also keep updating the custom ROM itself. If you have downloaded and installed LineageOS on your phone, what are your initial impressions? Do you think it’s a good successor to CyanogenOS? Let us know your first-hand impressions in the comments!

The post LineageOS builds now available for OnePlus 3T, ZTE Axon 7 and more appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

T-Mobile fires back at Verizon, will offer HD video and more with unlimited plan

Verizon’s surprise move to offer an unlimited data plan for smartphones and tablets once again, several years after it stopped offering those plans to customers, is already causing one of its competitors to make some changes. John Legere, the outspoken CEO of T-Mobile, revealed the company’s plans to tweak its ONE unlimited service, starting on Friday, February 17.

See also:

Thank Facebook Live, Netflix and Spotify for carriers embracing unlimited plans

6 hours ago

Legere used his Twitter account to reveal those changes. The big ones will allow current and new ONE unlimited subscribers a way to access HD streaming video, along with 10GB of high-speed data for mobile hotspots, at no extra cost. Those changes match what Verizon currently offers in its unlimited plan. It’s also an improvement over T-Mobile’s previous limit of 480p for streaming video and just 3G speeds for mobile hotspots for its normal ONE plan; you could get HD video and high-speed mobile hotspot data by spending $15 a month more for its ONE Plus plan.

Legere also stated that the company will launch a promotion that will price two lines of T-Mobile’s ONE unlimited plan for $100 a month. It’s not yet clear how long this promotion will last. Normally the price for two lines would be $120 a month.

T-Mobile’s changes to its ONE plan will likely be followed by Sprint and, we hope, AT&T sooner rather than later. Sprint still limits video streaming on its unlimited plan to 480p. More importantly, AT&T’s unlimited plan is limited (no pun intended) just to customers who also sign up for the company’s DirecTV satellite TV service or its U-verse fiber internet provider. AT&T is starting to look like a dinosaur compared to its competition, so hopefully we will see the carrier take some action to take with the other big wireless providers ASAP.

What do you think of T-Mobile’s tweaks to its ONE unlimited plan? Let us know your thoughts in the comments!

The post T-Mobile fires back at Verizon, will offer HD video and more with unlimited plan appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

HMD Global rumored to launch two new Nokia smartphones at MWC 2017

HMD Global surprised the world a few weeks ago when it launched its first Nokia-branded Android smartphone, the Nokia 6, in China. Since then, demand for the phone has reportedly exceeded its supply in that country. Now a new report claims the company will officially introduce two more Nokia Android phones as part of its announcements at the 2017 Mobile World Congress trade show later this month in Barcelona, Spain.

See also:

5 things Nokia, and HMD Global, need to do for a successful 2017 Android phone launch

November 23, 2016

This new rumor comes from VentureBeat and its resident gadget news leaker Evan Blass. He claims the new phones will be called the Nokia 5 and Nokia 3, and as you might guess, they won’t feature the same kind of hardware found on the Nokia 6. According to Blass’ unnamed sources, the Nokia 5 will have the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 processor as the Nokia 6. However, the Nokia 5 will have a 5.2-inch display, compared to the 5.5-inch screen on the Nokia 6.

The report also claims the Nokia 5 will have 2GB of RAM, versus the 4GB of memory on the Nokia 6. The Nokia 5 is also supposed to have a 12MP rear camera, compared to the 16MP camera on the Nokia 6. Pricing for the Nokia 6 in Europe is supposed to be €249, according to this report, and the Nokia 5 is supposed to sell for €199 in that part of the world. The story did not have any hardware info on the Nokia 3, but its price is supposed to be €149.

The Huffington Post

The same story also claims HMD Global will reveal a revival of the classic Nokia 3310 feature phone at MWC 2017. The phone, which is known for its long-lasting battery life and its ruggedness, is supposed to be priced at €59. Again, no specific hardware information was revealed.

We will be on the ground to get the first official information about HMD Global’s lineup of Nokia-branded phones in less than two weeks at MWC 2017, so stay tuned.

The post HMD Global rumored to launch two new Nokia smartphones at MWC 2017 appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

It’s not you, it’s your phone | Podcast 099

Joshua Vergara, Joe Hindy, Jonathan Feist and David Imel officially close out the double digits with episode 99 of the Android Authority Podcast. That might be a lie, with a special episode coming next week, delaying episode 100, but we’re close! Topics around the team included love and dating, but specifically how iPhone users have been found to judge Android users poorly. Android Wear 2.0 is rolling out, but is the smartwatch the right medium? Samsung putting the fingerprint scanner beside the camera, weird, but is that a problem? But first, we express that we’re not overly worried about the Google Now Launcher exiting the Play Store.

Stay tuned for a brand new show format coming soon, we want to get you, our faithful listeners, readers and viewers more involved in the show, and we think we have a solution.

The Android Authority Podcast – discussing topics in Android every week.

Rough Timecodes:
Check in with food, televisions, Bluetooth causing PC issues and more.
32:00 – Google Now Launcher going away
52:00 – Android Wear 2.0 update
70:00 – Samsung Galaxy S8 fingerprint sensor on the back?
84:00 – Love, and how iPhone users may think less of Android users

Links to Podcast

RSS Feed
iTunes
Stitcher
SoundCloud
Direct Download

Relevant Links

Android Authority Forums – Podcast discussion
Google Now Launcher going away
Android Wear 2.0 update
Samsung putting the fingerprint scanner on the back of the Galaxy S8?
How is your dating game – is your Android device bringing you down?

Follow our Hosts


Joshua Vergara
Twitter | Google+

Joseph Hindy
Twitter | Google+

Andrew Grush
Twitter | Google+

Jonathan Feist
Twitter | Google+

Nirave Gondhia
Twitter | Google+

John Dye
Twitter | Facebook

Lanh Nguyen
Twitter | YouTube

David Imel
Twitter | Instagram

Adam Molina
Twitter | Instagram

Recorded on February 9th, 2017 – Hosted and produced by Joshua Vergara.

“Have I told you of the power of apple cider vinegar?”

The post It’s not you, it’s your phone | Podcast 099 appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

N.O.V.A. Legacy will soon take Android gamers to the stars

http://ift.tt/2kr8zlv

In 2009, Gameloft released N.O.V.A. (Near Orbit Vanguard Alliance), a sci-fi first-person shooter for mobile devices. The game had more than a little resemblance to Microsoft’s Halo series for the Xbox, at least in terms of its art style. The game got solid reviews and was successful enough to spawn two sequels. However, the last game in the series, N.O.V.A. 3, was released way back in 2012, or about five years ago. Now Gameloft is posting up teasers for a new game called N.O.V.A. Legacy that will be coming soon to Android.

See also:

Best action games for Android!

1 week ago

Unfortunately, Gameloft is keeping many of the details of N.O.V.A. Legacy to itself, at least for now. It did release a teaser video today, but all it shows was a futuristic helmet floating in space, with no real gameplay footage.

The game’s official Facebook page does offer a little more info, saying that N.O.V.A. Legacy will offer the “best sci-fi FPS experience from the epic first episode of the critically acclaimed N.O.V.A. saga — all in a compact 20MB!”

You can pre-register on Facebook as well to get an alert for when N.O.V.A. Legacy goes live. That page also reveals a little more info on the game itself, including the fact that it will support online multiplayer with up to 6 players, along with a way to craft and upgrade your weapons. In fact, pre-registering will give players access to extra weapon upgrades, consumables and custom character skins that are worth $8, which also suggests that game will be of the free-to-play shooter genre.

Did you play the original N.O.V.A.? If so, will you check out this new and revamped edition in N.O.V.A. Legacy?

Pre-register now on Facebook

The post N.O.V.A. Legacy will soon take Android gamers to the stars appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 tablet render with S Pen leaks ahead of MWC 2017 reveal

http://ift.tt/2l9F9wX

Samsung has already strongly hinted in its 2017 Mobile World Congress press event invite that will reveal at least one new tablet on Feb. 26 in Barcelona, Spain. Now a new report claims to have an image of that tablet, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S3, while also showing its included S Pen.

See also:

Best Android tablets

4 weeks ago

Both the render and the report come from the German language site WinFuture.de, via unnamed sources. The pressure-sensitive S Pen will not have a way to store it in the Galaxy Tab S3, as the similar S Pen on the company’s Galaxy Note phones have done. Also, the story is reporting that there will just be a 9.7-inch version, as Samsung will not offer an 8-inch edition as it has with other tablets in the Tab S series.

The tablet will have a 2048×1536 SuperAMOLED display, along with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor inside, according to the report. It will also have 4GB of RAM and 32GB of onboard storage. It’s also supposed to have a 12MP rear camera and a 4.7MP front-facing camera. The tablet is supposed to come in Wi-Fi only models, along with ones with both Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity. Finally, the story claims that Samsung will sell the Galaxy Tab S3 in its normal black color, along with a silver version, which is meant to take the place of the previous white color option.

The story claims that the starting price for the Galaxy Tab S3 could be about $580, and we would assume that is for the Wi-Fi only version, and not with the one with the additional cellular wireless hardware. As always with these kinds of unconfirmed reports, take this one with a grain of salt until we get the official word from Samsung.

In the meantime we will be attending the company’s MWC 2017 press event and will get the first-hand info and impressions about whatever Samsung will reveal. There are rumors that the company could show a video preview of its next major smartphone flagship, the Galaxy S8, at the event on Feb. 26.

The post Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 tablet render with S Pen leaks ahead of MWC 2017 reveal appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.

New chip from MIT could mean power-efficient AI in all your electronics

http://ift.tt/2kqK7Rw

Researchers at MIT have developed a low-power chip specialized for automatic speech recognition that could result in a power savings of up to 99 percent.

See also:

Google Assistant may soon help you make online purchases

4 weeks ago

Although far from being perfect, Apple’s Siri transformed how we perceive mobile artificial intelligence. Since then we’ve seen similar attempts from various companies – from the disastrous S-Voice to the most recent Google Assistant. In fact, 2017 is shaping up to be the year of AI: Android Wear 2.0 has Google’s virtual assistant built in, Samsung is rumored to bring an improved AI assistant with the Galaxy S8, and IoT home devices are becoming more and more commonplace.

However, these advanced virtual assistants rely on speech recognition, and often, it has to be always on in order to detect your command. That means even the most power-efficient devices go from 100 percent to 0 pretty fast. Now, researchers at MIT have built a chip that’s specifically designed with that problem in mind. They explain that whereas a normal phone would use around 1 watt of power for speech-recognition, the new chip would only require a fraction of that: 0.2 to 10 milliwatts.

They explain that whereas a normal phone would use around 1 watt of power for speech-recognition, the new chip would only require a fraction of that: 0.2 to 10 milliwatts.

The way the new chip works is instead of running full-scale neural networks all the time to detect every sound and noise, it will have a simpler “voice activity detection” circuit that can spot human speech. Once it does detect human speech, the chip “fires up the larger, more complex speech-recognition circuit” according to MIT. The result is that we could see a power savings of anywhere from 90 percent all the way up to 99 percent, meaning even small and simple electronic devices could be powered by advanced speech-recognition systems and AI assistants.

As Anantha Chandrakasan, the Vannevar Bush Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, explains, the sheer efficiency of this new chip could mean wider use of speech input capabilities:

Speech input will become a natural interface for many wearable applications and intelligent devices. The miniaturization of these devices will require a different interface than touch or keyboard. It will be critical to embed the speech functionality locally to save system energy consumption compared to performing this operation in the cloud.

As wearables – smartwatches, earphones, glasses, etc. – grow, speech will become an essential mode of human-to-device communication. Given wearable devices’ usual size, MIT’s new power-efficient chip could be an answer to creating gadgets that last for long enough to be actually useful.

The post New chip from MIT could mean power-efficient AI in all your electronics appeared first on Latest Android Version Updates.